NLRB Files Complaint against Starbucks for Anti-Union Activity

The Grand Rapids Starbucks Workers Union announced today that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has filed a complaint against Starbucks alleging that it engaged in anti-union activity when it fired union barista Cole Dorsey from the company’s East Grand Rapids store.

Today, the Grand Rapids Starbucks Workers Union announced that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has filed a complaint against Starbucks for the firing of former Starbucks barista Cole Dorsey. The NLRB claims that Starbucks unlawfully terminated Dorsey because of his involvement in the Starbucks Workers Union. Additionally, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is currently determining whether or not Starbucks unlawfully terminated a barista who reported a leaky roof to the agency.

Excerpts from the Union’s press release:

Labor Board in Michigan Files Complaint Against Starbucks Over Illegal Union-Busting

A Further Complaint is Pending on Starbucks Lawyers Questioning of Baristas

Grand Rapids, MI- The Starbucks Coffee Co. barely had time to wipe the dust off after settling a Labor Board case against it in Minnesota when it got hit with another complaint here. With stark similarities to the Minnesota case and prior cases in New York, the National Labor Relations Board contends that Starbucks engaged in Unfair Labor Practices when it unlawfully terminated outspoken union member and barista, Cole Dorsey, because of his protected activities. Starbucks also has a week to decide if they will settle the complaint issued against them that they further engaged in Unfair Labor Practices through their lawyer’s interrogation of baristas. Starbucks is set to stand trial on November 20, 2008.

“Starbucks tried to quietly get rid of me because as a union member I speak out for the respect baristas deserve,” said Cole Dorsey, the fired barista and member of the IWW Starbucks Workers Union. “It’s time for Starbucks to start addressing the issues, like poverty wages to baristas and coffee farmers, instead of spending tons of money on anti-union lawyers and social responsibility advertising gimmicks.”

Concurrently, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the government’s health safety watchdog, will soon announce their decision of a recently concluded trial to determine whether a barista was unlawfully terminated for reporting a health violation.

In the OSHA trial, Starbucks management and local baristas testified regarding a barista who was fired a week after filing a health complaint over a leaky roof. Prior to the trial, lawyers from Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt, and Howlett interrogated multiple baristas in an attempt to find out what their answers would be at the OSHA trial. The prominent Grand Rapids corporate law firm continues to represent Starbucks after they signed a settlement agreement with the NLRB in 2006 saying they would end barista interrogations.

“Starbucks’ aggressive anti-union attorneys may have crossed the line into illegality,” said Pete Montalbano, a New York-based organizer with the IWW Starbucks Workers Union. “Given Starbucks’ track record of flaunting labor law, this doesn’t come as a surprise.”

Starbucks has previously settled charges with the NLRB over anti-union activities at its East Grand Rapids store.

Author: mediamouse

Grand Rapids independent media // mediamouse.org